The selections below estimate the winner of a head-to-head matchup between teams. This looks at previous head-to-head matchups, a power ranking (rank that is based on difficulty of schedule), vaprepsoftball.org rank, and the average run differential. The team with the heaviest weighted score is favored to win.
| Team | Opponent | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Albemarle | ||
| Albemarle | Albemarle | |
| Albemarle | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Albemarle | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | ||
| Alexandria City | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Alexandria City | |
| Alexandria City | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Alexandria City | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | ||
| Annandale | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Annandale | |
| Annandale | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Annandale | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | ||
| Battlefield | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Battlefield | |
| Battlefield | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Battlefield | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | ||
| Bayside | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Bayside | |
| Bayside | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bayside | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | ||
| Bethel | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Bethel | |
| Bethel | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Bethel | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | ||
| Briar Woods | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Briar Woods | |
| Briar Woods | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Briar Woods | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | ||
| Brooke Point | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Brooke Point | |
| Brooke Point | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Brooke Point | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | ||
| Centreville | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Centreville | |
| Centreville | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Centreville | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | ||
| Chantilly | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Chantilly | |
| Chantilly | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Chantilly | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | ||
| Clover Hill | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Clover Hill | |
| Clover Hill | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Clover Hill | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | ||
| Colgan | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Colgan | |
| Colgan | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colgan | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | ||
| Colonial Forge | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Colonial Forge | |
| Colonial Forge | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Colonial Forge | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | ||
| Cosby | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Cosby | |
| Cosby | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cosby | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | ||
| Cox | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Cox | |
| Cox | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Cox | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | ||
| Deep Creek | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Deep Creek | |
| Deep Creek | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Creek | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | ||
| Deep Run | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Deep Run | |
| Deep Run | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Deep Run | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | ||
| Edison | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Edison | |
| Edison | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Edison | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | ||
| Fairfax | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Fairfax | |
| Fairfax | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fairfax | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | ||
| Falls Church | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Falls Church | |
| Falls Church | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Falls Church | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | ||
| First Colonial | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | First Colonial | |
| First Colonial | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| First Colonial | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | ||
| Fleming | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Fleming | |
| Fleming | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Fleming | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | ||
| Forest Park | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Forest Park | |
| Forest Park | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Forest Park | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | ||
| Franklin County | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Franklin County | |
| Franklin County | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Franklin County | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | ||
| Freedom (South Riding) | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Freedom (South Riding) | |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | ||
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Freedom (Woodbridge) | |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | ||
| Freeman | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Freeman | |
| Freeman | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Freeman | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | ||
| Gainesville | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Gainesville | |
| Gainesville | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gainesville | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | ||
| Gar-Field | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Gar-Field | |
| Gar-Field | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Gar-Field | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | ||
| Glen Allen | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Glen Allen | |
| Glen Allen | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Glen Allen | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | ||
| Godwin | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Godwin | |
| Godwin | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Godwin | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | ||
| Granby | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Granby | |
| Granby | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Granby | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | ||
| Grassfield | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Grassfield | |
| Grassfield | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Grassfield | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | ||
| Great Bridge | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Great Bridge | |
| Great Bridge | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Great Bridge | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | ||
| Green Run | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Green Run | |
| Green Run | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Green Run | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | ||
| Harrisonburg | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Harrisonburg | |
| Harrisonburg | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Harrisonburg | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | ||
| Hayfield | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Hayfield | |
| Hayfield | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hayfield | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | ||
| Hermitage | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Hermitage | |
| Hermitage | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hermitage | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | ||
| Herndon | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Herndon | |
| Herndon | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Herndon | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | ||
| Hickory | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Hickory | |
| Hickory | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hickory | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | ||
| Highland Springs | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Highland Springs | |
| Highland Springs | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Highland Springs | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | ||
| Hylton | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Hylton | |
| Hylton | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Hylton | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | ||
| Independence | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Independence | |
| Independence | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Independence | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | ||
| Indian River | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Indian River | |
| Indian River | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Indian River | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | ||
| James River | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | James River | |
| James River | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| James River | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | ||
| Justice | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Justice | |
| Justice | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Justice | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | ||
| Kecoughtan | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Kecoughtan | |
| Kecoughtan | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kecoughtan | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | ||
| Kellam | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Kellam | |
| Kellam | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kellam | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | ||
| Kempsville | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Kempsville | |
| Kempsville | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kempsville | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | ||
| Kings Fork | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Kings Fork | |
| Kings Fork | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Kings Fork | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | ||
| L. C. Bird | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | L. C. Bird | |
| L. C. Bird | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| L. C. Bird | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | ||
| Lake Braddock | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Lake Braddock | |
| Lake Braddock | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lake Braddock | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | ||
| Lakeland | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Lakeland | |
| Lakeland | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lakeland | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | ||
| Landstown | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Landstown | |
| Landstown | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Landstown | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | ||
| Langley | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Langley | |
| Langley | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Langley | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | ||
| Lewis | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Lewis | |
| Lewis | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lewis | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | ||
| Lightridge | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Lightridge | |
| Lightridge | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Lightridge | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | ||
| Louisa County | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Louisa County | |
| Louisa County | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Louisa County | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | ||
| Madison | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Madison | |
| Madison | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Madison | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | ||
| Manchester | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Manchester | |
| Manchester | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Manchester | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | ||
| Marshall | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Marshall | |
| Marshall | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Marshall | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | ||
| Massaponax | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Massaponax | |
| Massaponax | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Massaponax | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | ||
| Matoaca | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Matoaca | |
| Matoaca | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Matoaca | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | ||
| Maury | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Maury | |
| Maury | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Maury | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | ||
| McLean | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | McLean | |
| McLean | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| McLean | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | ||
| Meadowbrook | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Meadowbrook | |
| Meadowbrook | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Meadowbrook | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | ||
| Menchville | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Menchville | |
| Menchville | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Menchville | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | ||
| Midlothian | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Midlothian | |
| Midlothian | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Midlothian | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | ||
| Mount Vernon | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Mount Vernon | |
| Mount Vernon | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mount Vernon | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | ||
| Mountain View | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Mountain View | |
| Mountain View | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Mountain View | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | ||
| Nansemond River | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Nansemond River | |
| Nansemond River | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Nansemond River | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | ||
| North Stafford | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | North Stafford | |
| North Stafford | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| North Stafford | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | ||
| Norview | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Norview | |
| Norview | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Norview | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | ||
| Oakton | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Oakton | |
| Oakton | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oakton | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | ||
| Ocean Lakes | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Ocean Lakes | |
| Ocean Lakes | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Ocean Lakes | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | ||
| Osbourn Park | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Osbourn Park | |
| Osbourn Park | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Osbourn Park | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | ||
| OsbournHS | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | OsbournHS | |
| OsbournHS | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| OsbournHS | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | ||
| Oscar Smith | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Oscar Smith | |
| Oscar Smith | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Oscar Smith | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | ||
| Patrick Henry | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Patrick Henry | |
| Patrick Henry | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patrick Henry | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | ||
| Patriot | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Patriot | |
| Patriot | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | ||
| Potomac Falls | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Potomac Falls | |
| Potomac Falls | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Falls | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | ||
| Potomac Senior | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Potomac Senior | |
| Potomac Senior | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Potomac Senior | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | ||
| Prince George | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Prince George | |
| Prince George | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Prince George | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | ||
| Princess Anne | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Princess Anne | |
| Princess Anne | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Princess Anne | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | ||
| Riverbend | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Riverbend | |
| Riverbend | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverbend | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | ||
| Riverside | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Riverside | |
| Riverside | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Riverside | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | ||
| Robinson | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Robinson | |
| Robinson | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Robinson | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | ||
| Rock Ridge | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Rock Ridge | |
| Rock Ridge | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Rock Ridge | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | ||
| Salem | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Salem | |
| Salem | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Salem | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | ||
| South County | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | South County | |
| South County | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South County | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | ||
| South Lakes | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | South Lakes | |
| South Lakes | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | ||
| StaffordHS | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | StaffordHS | |
| StaffordHS | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| StaffordHS | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | ||
| Stone Bridge | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Stone Bridge | |
| Stone Bridge | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Stone Bridge | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | ||
| Tallwood | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Tallwood | |
| Tallwood | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tallwood | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | ||
| Thomas Dale | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Thomas Dale | |
| Thomas Dale | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Dale | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | ||
| Thomas Jefferson | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Thomas Jefferson | |
| Thomas Jefferson | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | ||
| Tucker | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Tucker | |
| Tucker | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Tucker | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | ||
| Unity Reed | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Unity Reed | |
| Unity Reed | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Unity Reed | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | ||
| Wakefield | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Wakefield | |
| Wakefield | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wakefield | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | ||
| Warwick | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Warwick | |
| Warwick | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Warwick | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | ||
| Wash-Liberty | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Wash-Liberty | |
| Wash-Liberty | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Wash-Liberty | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | ||
| West Potomac | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | West Potomac | |
| West Potomac | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Potomac | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | ||
| West Springfield | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | West Springfield | |
| West Springfield | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| West Springfield | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | ||
| Western Branch | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Western Branch | |
| Western Branch | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Western Branch | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | ||
| Westfield | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Westfield | |
| Westfield | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Westfield | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | ||
| Woodbridge | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Woodbridge | |
| Woodbridge | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge), ranking (Woodbridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge), ranking (Woodbridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodbridge | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge), ranking (Woodbridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | ||
| Woodside | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge), ranking (Woodbridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Woodside | |
| Woodside | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodside), ranking (Woodside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodside | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodside), ranking (Woodside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | ||
| Woodson | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge), ranking (Woodbridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodside), ranking (Woodside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Woodson | Woodson | |
| Woodson | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | ||
| Yorktown | Albemarle | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALBEMARLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Albemarle), ranking (Albemarle), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Bayside | The overall winner of the competition would be: BAYSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bayside), ranking (Bayside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Bethel | The overall winner of the competition would be: BETHEL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Bethel), ranking (Bethel), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Briar Woods | The overall winner of the competition would be: BRIAR WOODS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Briar Woods), ranking (Briar Woods), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Clover Hill | The overall winner of the competition would be: CLOVER HILL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Clover Hill), ranking (Clover Hill), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Cox | The overall winner of the competition would be: COX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cox), ranking (Cox), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Deep Creek | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP CREEK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Creek), ranking (Deep Creek), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | First Colonial | The overall winner of the competition would be: FIRST COLONIAL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (First Colonial), ranking (First Colonial), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Fleming | The overall winner of the competition would be: FLEMING. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fleming), ranking (Fleming), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Franklin County | The overall winner of the competition would be: FRANKLIN COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Franklin County), ranking (Franklin County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Freeman | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEMAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freeman), ranking (Freeman), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Godwin | The overall winner of the competition would be: GODWIN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Godwin), ranking (Godwin), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Granby | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRANBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Granby), ranking (Granby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Great Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREAT BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Great Bridge), ranking (Great Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Green Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: GREEN RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Green Run), ranking (Green Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Harrisonburg | The overall winner of the competition would be: HARRISONBURG. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Harrisonburg), ranking (Harrisonburg), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Hermitage | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERMITAGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hermitage), ranking (Hermitage), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Hickory | The overall winner of the competition would be: HICKORY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hickory), ranking (Hickory), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Independence | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDEPENDENCE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Independence), ranking (Independence), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Indian River | The overall winner of the competition would be: INDIAN RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Indian River), ranking (Indian River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | James River | The overall winner of the competition would be: JAMES RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (James River), ranking (James River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Kecoughtan | The overall winner of the competition would be: KECOUGHTAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kecoughtan), ranking (Kecoughtan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Kellam | The overall winner of the competition would be: KELLAM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kellam), ranking (Kellam), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Kempsville | The overall winner of the competition would be: KEMPSVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kempsville), ranking (Kempsville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Kings Fork | The overall winner of the competition would be: KINGS FORK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Kings Fork), ranking (Kings Fork), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | L. C. Bird | The overall winner of the competition would be: L. C. BIRD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (L. C. Bird), ranking (L. C. Bird), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Lakeland | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKELAND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lakeland), ranking (Lakeland), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Lightridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LIGHTRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lightridge), ranking (Lightridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Louisa County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LOUISA COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Louisa County), ranking (Louisa County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Massaponax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MASSAPONAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Massaponax), ranking (Massaponax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Matoaca | The overall winner of the competition would be: MATOACA. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Matoaca), ranking (Matoaca), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Maury | The overall winner of the competition would be: MAURY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Maury), ranking (Maury), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MEADOWBROOK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Meadowbrook), ranking (Meadowbrook), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Menchville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MENCHVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Menchville), ranking (Menchville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Midlothian | The overall winner of the competition would be: MIDLOTHIAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Midlothian), ranking (Midlothian), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Nansemond River | The overall winner of the competition would be: NANSEMOND RIVER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Nansemond River), ranking (Nansemond River), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Norview | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORVIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Norview), ranking (Norview), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Ocean Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OCEAN LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Ocean Lakes), ranking (Ocean Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Patrick Henry | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRICK HENRY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patrick Henry), ranking (Patrick Henry), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Potomac Falls | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC FALLS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Falls), ranking (Potomac Falls), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Prince George | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCE GEORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Prince George), ranking (Prince George), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Princess Anne | The overall winner of the competition would be: PRINCESS ANNE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Princess Anne), ranking (Princess Anne), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Riverbend | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERBEND. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverbend), ranking (Riverbend), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Riverside | The overall winner of the competition would be: RIVERSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Riverside), ranking (Riverside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Rock Ridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROCK RIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Rock Ridge), ranking (Rock Ridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Salem | The overall winner of the competition would be: SALEM. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Salem), ranking (Salem), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Stone Bridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: STONE BRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Stone Bridge), ranking (Stone Bridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Tallwood | The overall winner of the competition would be: TALLWOOD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tallwood), ranking (Tallwood), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Tucker | The overall winner of the competition would be: TUCKER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tucker), ranking (Tucker), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Warwick | The overall winner of the competition would be: WARWICK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Warwick), ranking (Warwick), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Woodbridge | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge), ranking (Woodbridge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Woodside | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSIDE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodside), ranking (Woodside), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Yorktown | Yorktown |