The selections below estimate the winner of a head-to-head matchup between teams. This looks at previous head-to-head matchups, a power ranking (rank that is based on difficulty of schedule), vaprepsoftball.org rank, and the average run differential. The team with the heaviest weighted score is favored to win.
| Team | Opponent | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Alexandria City | ||
| Alexandria City | Alexandria City | |
| Alexandria City | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Alexandria City | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Alexandria City | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Alexandria City | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Alexandria City | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Alexandria City | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Alexandria City | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Alexandria City | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Alexandria City | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Alexandria City | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Alexandria City | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Fairfax), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Alexandria City | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Alexandria City | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Alexandria City | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Alexandria City | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Alexandria City | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Alexandria City | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Alexandria City | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Alexandria City | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Alexandria City | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Alexandria City | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Alexandria City | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Alexandria City | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Alexandria City | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Alexandria City | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Alexandria City | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Alexandria City | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Alexandria City | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Alexandria City | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Alexandria City | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Alexandria City | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Marshall), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Alexandria City | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Alexandria City | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Alexandria City | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Alexandria City | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Alexandria City | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Alexandria City | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Oakton), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Alexandria City | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Alexandria City | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Alexandria City | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Alexandria City | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Alexandria City | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Alexandria City | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Robinson), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Alexandria City | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South County), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (South County). |
| Alexandria City | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Alexandria City | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Alexandria City | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Alexandria City | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Alexandria City | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Alexandria City | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Alexandria City | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Alexandria City | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Alexandria City | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Alexandria City | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Alexandria City | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Alexandria City | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Alexandria City | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodson), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Alexandria City | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Annandale | ||
| Annandale | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Annandale | |
| Annandale | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Annandale | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Annandale | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Annandale | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Annandale | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Annandale | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Annandale | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Falls Church), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Annandale | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Annandale | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Annandale | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Annandale | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Annandale | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hayfield), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Annandale | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Annandale | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Annandale | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Annandale | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Annandale), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Annandale | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Annandale | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Annandale | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lewis), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Annandale | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Annandale | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Marshall), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Annandale | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Annandale | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Annandale), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Annandale | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Annandale | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Annandale | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Annandale | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (OsbournHS), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Annandale | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Annandale | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Annandale | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Annandale | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South County). |
| Annandale | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Annandale | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Annandale | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Annandale | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Annandale | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Annandale | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Annandale | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Annandale | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Annandale | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Annandale | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Annandale | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Annandale | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Annandale | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Battlefield | ||
| Battlefield | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Battlefield | |
| Battlefield | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Battlefield | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Battlefield | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Battlefield | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Freedom (South Riding)), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Battlefield | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Battlefield | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Battlefield | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Battlefield | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Battlefield | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Battlefield | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Brooke Point | ||
| Brooke Point | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Brooke Point | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Brooke Point | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Brooke Point | Brooke Point | |
| Brooke Point | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Brooke Point | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Brooke Point | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Brooke Point | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colonial Forge), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Brooke Point | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Brooke Point | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Brooke Point | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Brooke Point | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Brooke Point | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Brooke Point | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Brooke Point | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Brooke Point | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Brooke Point | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Brooke Point | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Brooke Point | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Brooke Point | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Brooke Point | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Brooke Point | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Brooke Point | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Brooke Point | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Brooke Point | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Brooke Point | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Brooke Point | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Brooke Point | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Brooke Point | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Brooke Point | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Brooke Point | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Brooke Point | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Brooke Point | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Brooke Point | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Brooke Point | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Brooke Point | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mountain View), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Brooke Point | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Brooke Point | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Brooke Point | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Brooke Point | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Brooke Point | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Brooke Point | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Brooke Point | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Brooke Point | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Brooke Point | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Brooke Point | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Brooke Point | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Brooke Point | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Brooke Point | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Brooke Point | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Brooke Point | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Brooke Point | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Brooke Point | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Brooke Point | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Brooke Point | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Brooke Point | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Brooke Point | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Brooke Point | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Brooke Point | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Centreville | ||
| Centreville | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Centreville | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Centreville | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Centreville | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Centreville | Centreville | |
| Centreville | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Centreville), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Centreville | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Centreville | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Centreville | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Centreville | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Centreville | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Centreville | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Centreville | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Centreville | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Centreville | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Centreville | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Centreville), and average run differential (Centreville). |
| Centreville | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Centreville | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Centreville). |
| Centreville | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Centreville), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Centreville | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Centreville | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Centreville | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Centreville | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Centreville | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Centreville | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Centreville). |
| Centreville | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Centreville | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Centreville | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Centreville | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Centreville | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Centreville | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Centreville | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Centreville | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Centreville | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Centreville). |
| Centreville | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Centreville | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Centreville | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Centreville | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Oakton), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Centreville | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Centreville | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Centreville | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Oscar Smith). |
| Centreville | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Centreville | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Centreville | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Centreville | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Centreville | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South Lakes), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Centreville | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Centreville | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Centreville | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Centreville | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Centreville), and average run differential (Centreville). |
| Centreville | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Centreville | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Centreville | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Centreville | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Centreville | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Centreville | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Westfield), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Centreville | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Centreville | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Centreville | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Chantilly | ||
| Chantilly | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Chantilly | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Chantilly | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Chantilly | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Chantilly | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Centreville), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Chantilly | Chantilly | |
| Chantilly | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Chantilly | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Chantilly | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Chantilly | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Chantilly | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Chantilly | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Chantilly | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Chantilly | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Chantilly | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Chantilly | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Chantilly | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Chantilly | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Chantilly | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Chantilly | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Chantilly | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Chantilly | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Herndon), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Chantilly | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Highland Springs), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Chantilly | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Chantilly | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Justice), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Chantilly | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Chantilly | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Chantilly | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Chantilly | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Lewis), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Chantilly | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Madison), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Chantilly | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Chantilly | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Marshall), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Chantilly | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Chantilly | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Meadowbrook), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Chantilly | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Chantilly | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Chantilly | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Chantilly | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Oakton), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Chantilly | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Chantilly | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Chantilly | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Chantilly | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Chantilly | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Chantilly | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Chantilly | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Chantilly | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South Lakes), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Chantilly | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Chantilly | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Thomas Dale), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Chantilly | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Chantilly | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Chantilly | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Chantilly | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Chantilly | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Chantilly | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Chantilly | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Chantilly | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Westfield), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Chantilly | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Chantilly | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Chantilly | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Colgan | ||
| Colgan | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Colgan | |
| Colgan | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Colgan | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Colgan | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Freedom (South Riding)), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Colgan | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Colgan | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Colgan | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Colgan | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Colgan | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colgan | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colonial Forge | ||
| Colonial Forge | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Colonial Forge | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colonial Forge), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Colonial Forge | Colonial Forge | |
| Colonial Forge | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Colonial Forge | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Colonial Forge | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Colonial Forge | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Colonial Forge | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Colonial Forge | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Colonial Forge | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colonial Forge), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Colonial Forge | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Colonial Forge | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Colonial Forge | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colonial Forge), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Colonial Forge | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Colonial Forge | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Colonial Forge | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Colonial Forge | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Colonial Forge | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Colonial Forge | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Colonial Forge | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (North Stafford), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Colonial Forge | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Colonial Forge | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Colonial Forge | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Colonial Forge | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (South County). |
| Colonial Forge | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Colonial Forge | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Colonial Forge | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Colonial Forge | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Colonial Forge | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Colonial Forge | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Colonial Forge | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Cosby | ||
| Cosby | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Cosby | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Cosby | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Cosby | |
| Cosby | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Cosby), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Cosby | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Cosby | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Cosby | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Cosby), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Cosby | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Cosby | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Cosby | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Cosby | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Cosby), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Cosby | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Cosby), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Cosby | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Cosby | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Deep Run | ||
| Deep Run | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Cosby), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Deep Run | |
| Deep Run | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Deep Run), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Deep Run | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Deep Run), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Deep Run | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Deep Run | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Deep Run | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Deep Run | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Edison | ||
| Edison | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Edison | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Edison | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Edison | Edison | |
| Edison | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Edison | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hayfield), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Edison | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Edison | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Edison | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Edison | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Marshall), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Edison | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Edison | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Edison | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Fairfax | ||
| Fairfax | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Fairfax), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Fairfax | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Fairfax | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Fairfax | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Fairfax | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Fairfax | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Fairfax | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Fairfax | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Fairfax | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Fairfax | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Fairfax | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Fairfax | Fairfax | |
| Fairfax | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Fairfax | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Fairfax | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Fairfax | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Fairfax | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Fairfax | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Fairfax | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Fairfax | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Fairfax | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Fairfax | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Fairfax | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Fairfax | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Fairfax | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Fairfax | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Fairfax | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Fairfax | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Fairfax | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Fairfax | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Fairfax | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Fairfax | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Fairfax | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Fairfax | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Fairfax | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Fairfax | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Fairfax | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Fairfax | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Fairfax), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Fairfax | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Fairfax | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Fairfax | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Fairfax | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Fairfax | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Fairfax | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Robinson), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Fairfax | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South County), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (South County). |
| Fairfax | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Fairfax | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Fairfax | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Fairfax | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Fairfax | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Fairfax | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Fairfax | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Fairfax), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Fairfax | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Fairfax | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (West Springfield), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Fairfax | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Fairfax | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Fairfax | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Fairfax | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Fairfax | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Falls Church | ||
| Falls Church | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Falls Church), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Falls Church | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Falls Church | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Falls Church | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Falls Church | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Falls Church | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Falls Church | |
| Falls Church | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Falls Church | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Falls Church | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Falls Church | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Falls Church | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Falls Church), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Falls Church | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Falls Church | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Falls Church | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Falls Church | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Falls Church | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Falls Church), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Falls Church | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Falls Church | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Falls Church | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Falls Church | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Falls Church | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Falls Church | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Falls Church), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Falls Church | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Falls Church | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodson), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Falls Church | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Forest Park | ||
| Forest Park | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Forest Park | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Forest Park | |
| Forest Park | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Forest Park | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Forest Park | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Forest Park | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mountain View), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Forest Park | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Forest Park | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | ||
| Freedom (South Riding) | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Freedom (South Riding)), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Freedom (South Riding)), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Freedom (South Riding) | |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Freedom (South Riding)), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Freedom (South Riding)), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (South County). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Freedom (South Riding)), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (South Riding) | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | ||
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Centreville), and average run differential (Centreville). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Freedom (Woodbridge) | |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Gar-Field), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Gar-Field). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Highland Springs), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hylton), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Justice), and average run differential (Justice). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Lewis), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Madison), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Meadowbrook), and average run differential (Freedom (Woodbridge)). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Oscar Smith). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Potomac Senior), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Thomas Dale), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Unity Reed), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Unity Reed). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Freedom (Woodbridge) | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Gainesville | ||
| Gainesville | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Gainesville | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Gainesville | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Gainesville | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Gainesville | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Gainesville | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Gainesville | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Gainesville | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Gainesville | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Gainesville | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Freedom (South Riding)), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Gainesville | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | Gainesville | |
| Gainesville | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Gainesville | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Gainesville | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Gainesville | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Gainesville | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Gainesville | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Gainesville | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Gainesville | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Gainesville | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Gainesville | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Gainesville | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Gainesville | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Gainesville | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Gainesville | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Gainesville), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Gainesville | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Gainesville | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Gainesville | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Gainesville | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Gainesville | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Gainesville | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Gainesville | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Gainesville | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (South County). |
| Gainesville | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South Lakes), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Gainesville | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Gainesville | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Gainesville | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Gainesville | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Gainesville), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Gainesville | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gainesville | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Gainesville | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Gainesville | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Gainesville | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Gainesville | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Gainesville | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Gainesville | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Gar-Field | ||
| Gar-Field | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Gar-Field | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Gar-Field | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Gar-Field | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Gar-Field | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Centreville). |
| Gar-Field | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Gar-Field | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Gar-Field | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colonial Forge), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Gar-Field | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Gar-Field | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Gar-Field | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Gar-Field | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Gar-Field | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Gar-Field | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Gar-Field | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Gar-Field | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Gar-Field), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Gar-Field). |
| Gar-Field | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Gar-Field | Gar-Field | |
| Gar-Field | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Gar-Field | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Gar-Field | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Gar-Field | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Gar-Field | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Gar-Field | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hylton), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Gar-Field | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Justice). |
| Gar-Field | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Gar-Field | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Gar-Field | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Gar-Field | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Gar-Field | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Gar-Field | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Gar-Field | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Gar-Field | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Gar-Field | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Gar-Field). |
| Gar-Field | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Gar-Field | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Gar-Field | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (North Stafford), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Gar-Field | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Gar-Field | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Gar-Field | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (OsbournHS), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Gar-Field | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Oscar Smith). |
| Gar-Field | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Gar-Field | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Potomac Senior), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Gar-Field | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Gar-Field | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Gar-Field | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Gar-Field | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Gar-Field | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Gar-Field | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Gar-Field | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Gar-Field). |
| Gar-Field | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Gar-Field | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Gar-Field | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Gar-Field | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Gar-Field | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Gar-Field | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Gar-Field | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Gar-Field | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Gar-Field | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Glen Allen | ||
| Glen Allen | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Glen Allen | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Centreville), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Glen Allen | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Cosby), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Glen Allen | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Deep Run), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Glen Allen | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Glen Allen | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Glen Allen | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Glen Allen | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Glen Allen | |
| Glen Allen | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Glen Allen | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Glen Allen | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Highland Springs), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Glen Allen | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Justice), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Glen Allen | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Glen Allen | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Lewis), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Madison), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Glen Allen | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Glen Allen | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Glen Allen | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Meadowbrook), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Glen Allen | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Glen Allen | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Glen Allen | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Glen Allen | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Glen Allen | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Glen Allen | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Glen Allen | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Thomas Dale), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Glen Allen | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Glen Allen | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Glen Allen | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Glen Allen | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Grassfield | ||
| Grassfield | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Grassfield | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Grassfield | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Grassfield | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Grassfield | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Grassfield | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Grassfield | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Grassfield | |
| Grassfield | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Grassfield | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Grassfield | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Grassfield | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Grassfield | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Grassfield | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Grassfield | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Grassfield), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Grassfield), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Grassfield | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Grassfield | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Grassfield | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Hayfield | ||
| Hayfield | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hayfield), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hayfield), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Hayfield | |
| Hayfield | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hayfield), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hayfield), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Hayfield | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Hayfield | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hayfield), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hayfield), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Hayfield | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hayfield | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Herndon | ||
| Herndon | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Herndon | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Herndon), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Herndon | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Herndon | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Herndon | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Herndon | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Herndon | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Herndon | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Herndon | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Herndon | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Herndon | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Herndon | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Herndon | Herndon | |
| Herndon | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Herndon | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Herndon | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Herndon | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Herndon | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Herndon | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Herndon | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Herndon | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Herndon | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Herndon | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Herndon | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Herndon | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Oakton), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Herndon | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Herndon | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Herndon | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Herndon | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Herndon | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Herndon | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (South County). |
| Herndon | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South Lakes), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Herndon | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Herndon | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Herndon | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Herndon | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Wakefield), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Herndon | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Wash-Liberty), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Herndon | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Herndon | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Herndon | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Herndon | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Herndon | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Herndon | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Herndon | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Highland Springs | ||
| Highland Springs | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Highland Springs | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Highland Springs), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Highland Springs | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Highland Springs | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Highland Springs | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Deep Run), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Highland Springs | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Highland Springs | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Highland Springs | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Highland Springs | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Highland Springs | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Highland Springs), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Highland Springs), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Highland Springs | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Highland Springs | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Highland Springs | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Highland Springs | |
| Highland Springs | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Highland Springs | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Highland Springs | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Highland Springs | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Highland Springs | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Manchester), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Highland Springs | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Highland Springs | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Highland Springs), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Highland Springs | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Highland Springs | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Highland Springs | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Highland Springs | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Highland Springs | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Highland Springs | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Highland Springs | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Highland Springs | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Highland Springs), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Highland Springs | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Highland Springs | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Highland Springs | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Highland Springs | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Highland Springs | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Hylton | ||
| Hylton | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Hylton | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Hylton | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colonial Forge), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Hylton | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Hylton | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Hylton | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Hylton | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hylton), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hylton), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Hylton | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Hylton | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Hylton | |
| Hylton | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Hylton | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Hylton | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Hylton | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Hylton | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (North Stafford), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Hylton | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hylton), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Hylton | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hylton), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Hylton | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Hylton | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Hylton | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Justice | ||
| Justice | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Justice | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Annandale), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Justice | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Justice | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Justice | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Centreville). |
| Justice | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Justice), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Justice | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Justice | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Justice | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Justice | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Justice | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Justice | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Justice | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Falls Church), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Justice | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Justice | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Justice | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Justice), and average run differential (Justice). |
| Justice | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Justice | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Justice). |
| Justice | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Justice), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Justice | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Justice | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hayfield), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Justice | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Justice | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Justice | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Justice | Justice | |
| Justice | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Justice | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Justice | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Justice | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Justice), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Justice | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Justice | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Justice | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Justice | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Justice | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Justice). |
| Justice | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mount Vernon), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Justice | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Justice | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Justice | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Justice | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Justice | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Justice | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Oscar Smith). |
| Justice | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Justice | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Justice | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Justice | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Justice | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Justice | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Justice | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Justice | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Thomas Jefferson), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Justice | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Justice), and average run differential (Justice). |
| Justice | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Justice | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Justice | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Justice | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Justice | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Justice | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Justice | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Justice | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Justice | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Lake Braddock | ||
| Lake Braddock | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Lake Braddock | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Lake Braddock | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Lake Braddock | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Lake Braddock | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Lake Braddock | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Lake Braddock | |
| Lake Braddock | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Lake Braddock | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Lake Braddock | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Lake Braddock | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Lake Braddock | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lake Braddock | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Landstown | ||
| Landstown | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Landstown | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Landstown | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Landstown | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Landstown | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Landstown | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Landstown | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Landstown | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Landstown | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Landstown | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Landstown | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Landstown | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Landstown | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Landstown | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Landstown | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Landstown | Landstown | |
| Landstown | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Landstown | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Landstown | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Landstown | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Landstown | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Landstown | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Landstown | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Landstown | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Landstown | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Landstown | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Landstown | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Landstown | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Landstown | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (South County). |
| Landstown | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Landstown | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Landstown | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Landstown | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Landstown | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Landstown | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Landstown | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Western Branch), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Landstown | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Landstown | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Landstown | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Landstown | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Langley | ||
| Langley | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Langley | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Langley | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Langley | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Langley | |
| Langley | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Langley | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Langley | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Langley | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Langley | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Lewis | ||
| Lewis | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Lewis | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lewis), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Lewis | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Lewis | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Lewis | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Lewis | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Lewis), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Lewis | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Lewis | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Lewis | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Lewis | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Lewis | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Lewis | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Lewis | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Lewis | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Lewis | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Lewis | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Lewis), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Lewis | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Lewis | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Lewis | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Lewis), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Lewis | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Lewis | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hayfield), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Lewis | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Lewis | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Lewis | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Lewis | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Justice), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Lewis | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Lewis | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Lewis | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Lewis | Lewis | |
| Lewis | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Lewis | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Lewis | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Lewis | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Lewis | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Lewis | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mount Vernon), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Lewis | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Lewis | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Lewis | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Lewis | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Lewis | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Lewis | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Lewis | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Lewis | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Lewis | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Lewis | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Lewis | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Lewis | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Lewis | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Lewis | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lewis), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Lewis | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Lewis), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Lewis | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Lewis | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Lewis | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Lewis | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Lewis | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Lewis | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Lewis | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Lewis | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Lewis | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Madison | ||
| Madison | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Madison), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Madison), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Madison), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Madison | |
| Madison | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Madison), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Madison | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Manchester | ||
| Manchester | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Manchester | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Manchester | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Cosby), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Manchester | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Manchester | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Manchester | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Manchester | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Manchester | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Manchester | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Manchester), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Manchester | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Manchester | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Manchester | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Manchester | Manchester | |
| Manchester | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Manchester | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Manchester | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Manchester | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South County). |
| Manchester | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Manchester), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Manchester | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Manchester | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Manchester | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Marshall | ||
| Marshall | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Marshall), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Marshall), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Marshall | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Marshall), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Marshall | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Marshall | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Marshall | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Marshall | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Marshall), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Marshall | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Marshall | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Marshall | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Marshall | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Marshall | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Marshall | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Marshall | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Marshall | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Marshall | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Marshall | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Marshall | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Marshall | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Marshall | Marshall | |
| Marshall | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Marshall | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Marshall | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Marshall | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Oakton), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Marshall | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Marshall | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Marshall | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Marshall | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Marshall | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (South County). |
| Marshall | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Marshall | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Marshall | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Marshall | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Marshall | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Wakefield), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Marshall), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Marshall | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Marshall | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Marshall | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Marshall | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Marshall | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Yorktown), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| McLean | ||
| McLean | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (Madison). |
| McLean | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | McLean | |
| McLean | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (McLean). |
| McLean | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Meadowbrook | ||
| Meadowbrook | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Meadowbrook | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Meadowbrook | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Meadowbrook | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Meadowbrook | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Centreville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Centreville). |
| Meadowbrook | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Meadowbrook), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Meadowbrook | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Meadowbrook | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Meadowbrook | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Meadowbrook | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Meadowbrook | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Meadowbrook | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Meadowbrook | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Meadowbrook | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Meadowbrook | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Meadowbrook | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (WOODBRIDGE). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), ranking (Freedom (Woodbridge)), total number of games played (Meadowbrook), and average run differential (Freedom (Woodbridge)). |
| Meadowbrook | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Meadowbrook | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAR-FIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gar-Field), ranking (Gar-Field), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Gar-Field). |
| Meadowbrook | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Meadowbrook), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Meadowbrook | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Meadowbrook | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Meadowbrook | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Meadowbrook | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Highland Springs), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Meadowbrook | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Meadowbrook | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Justice). |
| Meadowbrook | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Meadowbrook | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Meadowbrook | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Meadowbrook | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Meadowbrook | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Meadowbrook | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Meadowbrook | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Meadowbrook | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Meadowbrook | Meadowbrook | |
| Meadowbrook | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Meadowbrook | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Meadowbrook | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Meadowbrook | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Meadowbrook | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Meadowbrook | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Meadowbrook | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Oscar Smith). |
| Meadowbrook | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Meadowbrook | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Meadowbrook | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Meadowbrook | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Meadowbrook | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Meadowbrook | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Meadowbrook | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Thomas Dale), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Meadowbrook | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Meadowbrook | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Meadowbrook), and average run differential (Unity Reed). |
| Meadowbrook | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Meadowbrook | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Meadowbrook | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Meadowbrook | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Meadowbrook | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Meadowbrook | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Meadowbrook | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Meadowbrook | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Meadowbrook | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Mount Vernon | ||
| Mount Vernon | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Mount Vernon | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Annandale), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Mount Vernon | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Mount Vernon | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Mount Vernon | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Mount Vernon | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Mount Vernon | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Mount Vernon | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Mount Vernon | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Mount Vernon | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Mount Vernon | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Mount Vernon | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Mount Vernon | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Falls Church), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Mount Vernon | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Mount Vernon | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Mount Vernon | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Mount Vernon | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Mount Vernon | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Mount Vernon | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Mount Vernon | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Mount Vernon | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hayfield), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Mount Vernon | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Mount Vernon | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Mount Vernon | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Mount Vernon | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mount Vernon), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Mount Vernon | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Mount Vernon | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Mount Vernon | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Mount Vernon | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mount Vernon), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Mount Vernon | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Mount Vernon | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Mount Vernon | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Mount Vernon | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Mount Vernon | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Mount Vernon | Mount Vernon | |
| Mount Vernon | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mount Vernon | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Mount Vernon | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Oakton), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Mount Vernon | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Mount Vernon | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (OsbournHS), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Mount Vernon | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Mount Vernon | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Mount Vernon | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Mount Vernon | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Mount Vernon | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (South County). |
| Mount Vernon | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Mount Vernon | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Mount Vernon | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Mount Vernon | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Thomas Jefferson), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Mount Vernon | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Mount Vernon | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Mount Vernon | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Mount Vernon | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Mount Vernon | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Mount Vernon | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Mount Vernon | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Mount Vernon | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Mount Vernon | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Mount Vernon | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Mountain View | ||
| Mountain View | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Mountain View | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mountain View), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Mountain View | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Mountain View | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Mountain View | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Mountain View | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mountain View), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Mountain View | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Gainesville), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Mountain View | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Mountain View | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Mountain View | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Mountain View | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Mountain View | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Mountain View | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Mountain View | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Mountain View | |
| Mountain View | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mountain View), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Mountain View | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mountain View), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (South County). |
| Mountain View | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mountain View), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Mountain View | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Mountain View | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Mountain View | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| North Stafford | ||
| North Stafford | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| North Stafford | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| North Stafford | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (North Stafford), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| North Stafford | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| North Stafford | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Edison). |
| North Stafford | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| North Stafford | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (North Stafford), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| North Stafford | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| North Stafford | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (North Stafford), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| North Stafford | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| North Stafford | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Langley). |
| North Stafford | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Madison). |
| North Stafford | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| North Stafford | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (McLean). |
| North Stafford | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mountain View), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| North Stafford | North Stafford | |
| North Stafford | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| North Stafford | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| North Stafford | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (South County). |
| North Stafford | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| North Stafford | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| North Stafford | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| North Stafford | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Oakton | ||
| Oakton | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Oakton), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Oakton | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Oakton), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Oakton), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Oakton | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Oakton | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Oakton | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Oakton | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Oakton | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Fairfax), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Oakton | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Oakton | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Oakton | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Oakton | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Oakton | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Oakton | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Oakton), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Oakton | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Oakton | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Oakton | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Oakton | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Oakton | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Oakton | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Oakton), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Oakton | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Oakton), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Oakton | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Oakton | Oakton | |
| Oakton | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Oakton | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Oakton | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Oakton | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South County). |
| Oakton | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Oakton | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Oakton | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Oakton | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Oakton | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Oakton | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Westfield), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Oakton | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Oakton | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oakton | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Osbourn Park | ||
| Osbourn Park | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Osbourn Park | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Osbourn Park | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Osbourn Park | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Osbourn Park | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Osbourn Park | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Osbourn Park | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Osbourn Park | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Osbourn Park | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Osbourn Park | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Osbourn Park | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Osbourn Park | |
| Osbourn Park | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Osbourn Park | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Osbourn Park | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| OsbournHS | ||
| OsbournHS | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (OsbournHS), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| OsbournHS | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| OsbournHS | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| OsbournHS | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| OsbournHS | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| OsbournHS | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Edison). |
| OsbournHS | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| OsbournHS | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| OsbournHS | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Freedom (South Riding)), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| OsbournHS | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (OsbournHS), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| OsbournHS | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| OsbournHS | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| OsbournHS | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| OsbournHS | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hylton), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| OsbournHS | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| OsbournHS | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Langley). |
| OsbournHS | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Madison). |
| OsbournHS | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| OsbournHS | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (McLean). |
| OsbournHS | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (OsbournHS), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| OsbournHS | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| OsbournHS | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| OsbournHS | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| OsbournHS | OsbournHS | |
| OsbournHS | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| OsbournHS | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Potomac Senior), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| OsbournHS | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (South County). |
| OsbournHS | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| OsbournHS | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| OsbournHS | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| OsbournHS | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (OsbournHS), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| OsbournHS | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| OsbournHS | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| OsbournHS | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| OsbournHS | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| OsbournHS | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Oscar Smith | ||
| Oscar Smith | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Oscar Smith | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Oscar Smith | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Oscar Smith | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Oscar Smith | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Oscar Smith). |
| Oscar Smith | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Oscar Smith | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Oscar Smith | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Oscar Smith | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Oscar Smith | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Oscar Smith | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Oscar Smith | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Oscar Smith | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Oscar Smith | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Oscar Smith | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Oscar Smith | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Oscar Smith). |
| Oscar Smith | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Oscar Smith | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Oscar Smith). |
| Oscar Smith | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Oscar Smith | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Grassfield), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Oscar Smith | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Oscar Smith | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Oscar Smith | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Oscar Smith | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Oscar Smith | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Oscar Smith). |
| Oscar Smith | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Oscar Smith | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Oscar Smith | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Oscar Smith | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Oscar Smith | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Oscar Smith | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Oscar Smith | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Oscar Smith | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Oscar Smith | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Oscar Smith). |
| Oscar Smith | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Oscar Smith | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Oscar Smith | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Oscar Smith | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Oscar Smith | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Oscar Smith | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Oscar Smith | Oscar Smith | |
| Oscar Smith | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Oscar Smith | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Oscar Smith | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Oscar Smith | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Oscar Smith | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Oscar Smith | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Oscar Smith | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Oscar Smith | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Oscar Smith | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Oscar Smith). |
| Oscar Smith | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Oscar Smith | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Oscar Smith | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Oscar Smith | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Oscar Smith | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Oscar Smith | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Oscar Smith | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Oscar Smith | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Oscar Smith | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Patriot | ||
| Patriot | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Patriot | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Patriot | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Patriot | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Patriot | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Patriot | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Patriot | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Patriot | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Patriot | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Patriot | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Patriot | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Patriot | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Patriot | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Patriot | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Patriot | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Patriot | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mountain View), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Patriot | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Patriot | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Patriot | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Patriot | |
| Patriot | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Patriot | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (South County). |
| Patriot | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| Patriot | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Patriot | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Patriot | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Patriot | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Patriot | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Potomac Senior | ||
| Potomac Senior | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Potomac Senior | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Potomac Senior | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Potomac Senior | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Potomac Senior | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Potomac Senior | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Potomac Senior | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Potomac Senior | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Potomac Senior | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Potomac Senior | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Potomac Senior), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Potomac Senior), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Potomac Senior | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Potomac Senior | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Potomac Senior | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Potomac Senior | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Potomac Senior | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Potomac Senior | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Potomac Senior | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Potomac Senior | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Potomac Senior | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Potomac Senior | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Potomac Senior | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Potomac Senior | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Potomac Senior | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Potomac Senior | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Potomac Senior | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Potomac Senior | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Potomac Senior), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Potomac Senior | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Potomac Senior | Potomac Senior | |
| Potomac Senior | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Potomac Senior | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Potomac Senior | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Potomac Senior | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (StaffordHS), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Potomac Senior | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Potomac Senior | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Potomac Senior | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Potomac Senior | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Potomac Senior | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Potomac Senior | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Potomac Senior | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Potomac Senior | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Robinson | ||
| Robinson | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Robinson), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Robinson | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Robinson | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Robinson | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Robinson | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Robinson | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Robinson), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Robinson | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Robinson | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Robinson | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Robinson | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Robinson | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Robinson | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Robinson | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Robinson | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Robinson | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Robinson | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Robinson | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Robinson | |
| Robinson | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Robinson | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Robinson), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Robinson | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Robinson | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Robinson | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| South County | ||
| South County | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South County), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| South County | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| South County | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| South County | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| South County | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| South County | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South County), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| South County | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| South County | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| South County | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| South County | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (Langley). |
| South County | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (Madison). |
| South County | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| South County | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| South County | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | South County | |
| South County | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South County), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South County), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| South County | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Westfield), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| South County | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South County), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (South County). |
| South County | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (South County). |
| South Lakes | ||
| South Lakes | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| South Lakes | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South Lakes), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South Lakes), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| South Lakes | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| South Lakes | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| South Lakes | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| South Lakes | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| South Lakes | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| South Lakes | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South Lakes), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| South Lakes | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| South Lakes | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South Lakes), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| South Lakes | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| South Lakes | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Langley). |
| South Lakes | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Madison). |
| South Lakes | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| South Lakes | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (McLean). |
| South Lakes | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| South Lakes | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| South Lakes | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| South Lakes | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Tie). |
| South Lakes | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| South Lakes | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South County). |
| South Lakes | South Lakes | |
| South Lakes | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| South Lakes | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| South Lakes | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| South Lakes | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| South Lakes | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South Lakes), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| StaffordHS | ||
| StaffordHS | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| StaffordHS | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| StaffordHS | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| StaffordHS | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| StaffordHS | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| StaffordHS | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| StaffordHS | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| StaffordHS | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| StaffordHS | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| StaffordHS | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| StaffordHS | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| StaffordHS | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| StaffordHS | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| StaffordHS | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| StaffordHS | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| StaffordHS | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Langley). |
| StaffordHS | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Madison). |
| StaffordHS | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| StaffordHS | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| StaffordHS | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Mountain View), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| StaffordHS | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| StaffordHS | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| StaffordHS | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| StaffordHS | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (StaffordHS), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| StaffordHS | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South County). |
| StaffordHS | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| StaffordHS | StaffordHS | |
| StaffordHS | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| StaffordHS | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| StaffordHS | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| StaffordHS | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| StaffordHS | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| StaffordHS | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| StaffordHS | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Thomas Dale | ||
| Thomas Dale | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Thomas Dale | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Thomas Dale), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Thomas Dale | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Cosby), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Thomas Dale | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Thomas Dale | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Thomas Dale | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Thomas Dale | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Thomas Dale), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Thomas Dale), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Thomas Dale | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Thomas Dale | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Thomas Dale | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Thomas Dale | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Thomas Dale | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Thomas Dale | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Manchester), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Thomas Dale | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Thomas Dale | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Thomas Dale), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Thomas Dale | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Thomas Dale | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Thomas Dale | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Thomas Dale | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Thomas Dale | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Thomas Dale | |
| Thomas Dale | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Thomas Dale), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Thomas Dale | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Thomas Dale | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Dale | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Jefferson | ||
| Thomas Jefferson | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Edison), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Falls Church), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hayfield), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Thomas Jefferson), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lewis), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Thomas Jefferson), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Thomas Jefferson | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Thomas Jefferson | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Thomas Jefferson | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Thomas Jefferson | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Thomas Jefferson | |
| Thomas Jefferson | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Thomas Jefferson | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Unity Reed | ||
| Unity Reed | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: ALEXANDRIA CITY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Alexandria City), ranking (Alexandria City), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Alexandria City). |
| Unity Reed | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Unity Reed | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Unity Reed | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: BROOKE POINT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Brooke Point), ranking (Brooke Point), total number of games played (Brooke Point), and average run differential (Brooke Point). |
| Unity Reed | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: CENTREVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Centreville), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Centreville), and average run differential (Centreville). |
| Unity Reed | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: CHANTILLY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Chantilly), ranking (Chantilly), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Chantilly). |
| Unity Reed | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Unity Reed | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Unity Reed | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Unity Reed | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Unity Reed | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Unity Reed | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Unity Reed | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Falls Church), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Unity Reed | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Unity Reed | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Freedom (South Riding)), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Unity Reed | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Unity Reed), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Unity Reed). |
| Unity Reed | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: GAINESVILLE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Gainesville), power ranking (Gainesville), ranking (Gainesville), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Unity Reed | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Gar-Field), and average run differential (Gar-Field). |
| Unity Reed | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Unity Reed | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Grassfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Unity Reed | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Unity Reed | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: HERNDON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Herndon), ranking (Herndon), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Unity Reed | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Highland Springs), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Unity Reed | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Hylton), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Hylton), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Unity Reed | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: JUSTICE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Justice), ranking (Justice), total number of games played (Justice), and average run differential (Justice). |
| Unity Reed | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Unity Reed | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Unity Reed | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Langley), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Unity Reed | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: LEWIS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Lewis), and average run differential (Lewis). |
| Unity Reed | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Madison), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Unity Reed | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Unity Reed | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Unity Reed | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Unity Reed | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: UNITY REED. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Unity Reed), ranking (Unity Reed), total number of games played (Meadowbrook), and average run differential (Unity Reed). |
| Unity Reed | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNT VERNON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mount Vernon), ranking (Mount Vernon), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Unity Reed | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Unity Reed | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Unity Reed | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Unity Reed | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Unity Reed | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (OsbournHS), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Unity Reed | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSCAR SMITH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oscar Smith), ranking (Oscar Smith), total number of games played (Oscar Smith), and average run differential (Oscar Smith). |
| Unity Reed | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Unity Reed | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Potomac Senior), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Unity Reed | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Robinson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Unity Reed | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Unity Reed | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Unity Reed | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Unity Reed | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Thomas Dale), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Unity Reed | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Thomas Jefferson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Unity Reed | Unity Reed | |
| Unity Reed | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Unity Reed | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Unity Reed | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Unity Reed | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Unity Reed | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Unity Reed | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Unity Reed | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Unity Reed | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Unity Reed | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Wakefield | ||
| Wakefield | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Annandale), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Wakefield | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Wakefield | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Wakefield | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Wakefield | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Deep Run), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Wakefield | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Wakefield | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Wakefield | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Wakefield | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Wakefield | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Wakefield | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Wakefield | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Wakefield | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Wakefield), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Wakefield | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Wakefield | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Wakefield | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Wakefield | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Wakefield | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Wakefield | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Manchester), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Wakefield | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Wakefield), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Wakefield | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (McLean), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Wakefield | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Wakefield | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Wakefield | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Oakton), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Wakefield | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Wakefield | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Wakefield | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Wakefield | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Wakefield | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Wakefield | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (South County), and average run differential (South County). |
| Wakefield | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Wakefield | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (StaffordHS), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Wakefield | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Wakefield | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Wakefield | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wakefield), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | Wakefield | |
| Wakefield | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wakefield | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Wakefield | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Wakefield | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Wakefield | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Wakefield | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Wakefield | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Yorktown), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Wash-Liberty | ||
| Wash-Liberty | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Wash-Liberty | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: ANNANDALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Annandale). |
| Wash-Liberty | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Wash-Liberty | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Wash-Liberty | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Wash-Liberty | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Wash-Liberty | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Wash-Liberty | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Wash-Liberty | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Wash-Liberty | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Wash-Liberty | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Wash-Liberty | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: FAIRFAX. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Fairfax), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Fairfax). |
| Wash-Liberty | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Wash-Liberty | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Wash-Liberty | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Wash-Liberty | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Wash-Liberty | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Gainesville). |
| Wash-Liberty | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Wash-Liberty | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Wash-Liberty | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Wash-Liberty | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Wash-Liberty | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Wash-Liberty), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Herndon). |
| Wash-Liberty | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Wash-Liberty | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Wash-Liberty | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Wash-Liberty | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Wash-Liberty | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| Wash-Liberty | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Wash-Liberty | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Wash-Liberty | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Wash-Liberty | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Wash-Liberty | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Marshall), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Wash-Liberty | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Wash-Liberty | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Wash-Liberty | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Mount Vernon). |
| Wash-Liberty | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Wash-Liberty | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Wash-Liberty | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Wash-Liberty | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Wash-Liberty | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Wash-Liberty | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Wash-Liberty | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Wash-Liberty | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| Wash-Liberty | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Wash-Liberty | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (South County). |
| Wash-Liberty | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Wash-Liberty | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Wash-Liberty | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Wash-Liberty | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Wash-Liberty | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: WASH-LIBERTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wash-Liberty), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wash-Liberty). |
| Wash-Liberty | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| Wash-Liberty | Wash-Liberty | |
| Wash-Liberty | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tie), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| Wash-Liberty | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (West Springfield), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Wash-Liberty | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Wash-Liberty | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Wash-Liberty | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Wash-Liberty | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Wash-Liberty | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Yorktown), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| West Potomac | ||
| West Potomac | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Annandale), ranking (Annandale), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| West Potomac | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| West Potomac | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| West Potomac | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| West Potomac | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| West Potomac | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Edison). |
| West Potomac | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Fairfax), ranking (Fairfax), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| West Potomac | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Forest Park), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| West Potomac | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| West Potomac | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: GLEN ALLEN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Glen Allen), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| West Potomac | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| West Potomac | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| West Potomac | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| West Potomac | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| West Potomac | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| West Potomac | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANDSTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Landstown), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Landstown). |
| West Potomac | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Langley). |
| West Potomac | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lewis), ranking (Lewis), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Madison). |
| West Potomac | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| West Potomac | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Marshall), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| West Potomac | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (McLean). |
| West Potomac | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| West Potomac | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| West Potomac | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| West Potomac | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| West Potomac | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (OsbournHS), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| West Potomac | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| West Potomac | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: POTOMAC SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Potomac Senior), ranking (Potomac Senior), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Potomac Senior). |
| West Potomac | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| West Potomac | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South County), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (South County). |
| West Potomac | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| West Potomac | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| West Potomac | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| West Potomac | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS JEFFERSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Jefferson), ranking (Thomas Jefferson), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| West Potomac | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Potomac), ranking (West Potomac), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WAKEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Wakefield). |
| West Potomac | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST POTOMAC. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Tie), ranking (Wash-Liberty), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Potomac). |
| West Potomac | West Potomac | |
| West Potomac | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (West Springfield), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Potomac | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| West Potomac | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Westfield), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| West Potomac | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| West Potomac | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| West Potomac | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| West Springfield | ||
| West Springfield | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| West Springfield | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| West Springfield | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| West Springfield | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| West Springfield | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| West Springfield | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (West Springfield), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| West Springfield | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| West Springfield | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| West Springfield | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| West Springfield | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| West Springfield | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| West Springfield | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| West Springfield | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| West Springfield | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Langley). |
| West Springfield | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Madison). |
| West Springfield | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| West Springfield | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (McLean). |
| West Springfield | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| West Springfield | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| West Springfield | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| West Springfield | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| West Springfield | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Robinson), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| West Springfield | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South County), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (South County). |
| West Springfield | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| West Springfield | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| West Springfield | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (West Springfield), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (West Springfield), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | West Springfield | |
| West Springfield | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| West Springfield | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| West Springfield | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (West Springfield), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| West Springfield | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (West Springfield), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Western Branch | ||
| Western Branch | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Western Branch | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Western Branch | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Western Branch | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Western Branch | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Western Branch | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Western Branch | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Grassfield), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Western Branch | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Western Branch | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Western Branch), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Western Branch | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Western Branch | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Western Branch | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Western Branch | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Western Branch | |
| Western Branch | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Western Branch | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Western Branch | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Westfield | ||
| Westfield | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Battlefield), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Westfield | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Westfield), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Westfield), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Westfield | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Westfield | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Westfield | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Westfield | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Westfield | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Westfield | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Westfield | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Westfield | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Westfield | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Westfield | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Westfield | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Westfield | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Westfield | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Westfield | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Madison), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Westfield | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Westfield | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Westfield | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Westfield | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Westfield | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Westfield), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Westfield | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Westfield | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Westfield | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Westfield), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (South County). |
| Westfield | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Westfield | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Westfield | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Westfield), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Westfield | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Westfield | Westfield | |
| Westfield | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Westfield | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Westfield | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Yorktown), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Woodbridge Senior | ||
| Woodbridge Senior | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Colgan), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Cosby), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Edison), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Fairfax), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Hayfield), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Landstown), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Osbourn Park), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Patriot), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Patriot), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodbridge Senior), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (South Lakes), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodbridge Senior), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Wash-Liberty), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (West Springfield), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Western Branch), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Woodbridge Senior | |
| Woodbridge Senior | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodbridge Senior | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodson | ||
| Woodson | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodson), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Alexandria City), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Battlefield), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Woodson | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Colgan), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Woodson | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Colonial Forge), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Woodson | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Woodson | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Woodson | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Woodson | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Woodson), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Woodson | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Forest Park), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Woodson | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Freedom (South Riding)), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Woodson | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Gainesville), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Glen Allen), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Woodson | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Woodson | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Woodson | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Herndon), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: HIGHLAND SPRINGS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Highland Springs), ranking (Highland Springs), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Woodson | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: HYLTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hylton), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Woodson | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Lake Braddock), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Woodson | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Landstown), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Woodson | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Woodson | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Woodson | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: MARSHALL. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Marshall), total number of games played (Marshall), and average run differential (Marshall). |
| Woodson | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Woodson | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Mount Vernon), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Mountain View), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Woodson | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (North Stafford), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Woodson | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Woodson | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Osbourn Park), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Woodson | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURNHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (OsbournHS), total number of games played (OsbournHS), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Woodson | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Woodson | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Woodson | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South County), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (South County). |
| Woodson | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Woodson | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: STAFFORDHS. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (StaffordHS), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Woodson | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Woodson | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Thomas Jefferson). |
| Woodson | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Wakefield), ranking (Wakefield), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodson), ranking (Woodson), total number of games played (West Potomac), and average run differential (Woodson). |
| Woodson | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (West Springfield), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Woodson | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Tie), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Woodson | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Westfield), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Woodson | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Woodson), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Woodson | Woodson | |
| Woodson | Yorktown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | ||
| Yorktown | Alexandria City | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Annandale | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Battlefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: BATTLEFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Battlefield), ranking (Battlefield), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Battlefield). |
| Yorktown | Brooke Point | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Centreville | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Chantilly | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Colgan | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLGAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colgan), ranking (Colgan), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Colgan). |
| Yorktown | Colonial Forge | The overall winner of the competition would be: COLONIAL FORGE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Colonial Forge), ranking (Colonial Forge), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Colonial Forge). |
| Yorktown | Cosby | The overall winner of the competition would be: COSBY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Cosby), ranking (Cosby), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Cosby). |
| Yorktown | Deep Run | The overall winner of the competition would be: DEEP RUN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Deep Run), ranking (Deep Run), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Deep Run). |
| Yorktown | Edison | The overall winner of the competition would be: EDISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Edison), ranking (Edison), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Edison). |
| Yorktown | Fairfax | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Falls Church | The overall winner of the competition would be: FALLS CHURCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Falls Church), ranking (Falls Church), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Falls Church). |
| Yorktown | Forest Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: FOREST PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Forest Park), ranking (Forest Park), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Forest Park). |
| Yorktown | Freedom (South Riding) | The overall winner of the competition would be: FREEDOM (SOUTH RIDING). This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), ranking (Freedom (South Riding)), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Freedom (South Riding)). |
| Yorktown | Freedom (Woodbridge) | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Gainesville | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Gar-Field | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Glen Allen | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Glen Allen). |
| Yorktown | Grassfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: GRASSFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Grassfield), ranking (Grassfield), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Grassfield). |
| Yorktown | Hayfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: HAYFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Hayfield), ranking (Hayfield), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Hayfield). |
| Yorktown | Herndon | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Highland Springs | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Highland Springs). |
| Yorktown | Hylton | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Hylton), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Hylton). |
| Yorktown | Justice | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Lake Braddock | The overall winner of the competition would be: LAKE BRADDOCK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Lake Braddock), power ranking (Lake Braddock), ranking (Lake Braddock), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Lake Braddock). |
| Yorktown | Landstown | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Langley | The overall winner of the competition would be: LANGLEY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Langley), power ranking (Langley), ranking (Langley), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Langley). |
| Yorktown | Lewis | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Madison | The overall winner of the competition would be: MADISON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Madison), ranking (Madison), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Madison). |
| Yorktown | Manchester | The overall winner of the competition would be: MANCHESTER. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Manchester), ranking (Manchester), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Manchester). |
| Yorktown | Marshall | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Yorktown), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | McLean | The overall winner of the competition would be: MCLEAN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (McLean), power ranking (McLean), ranking (McLean), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (McLean). |
| Yorktown | Meadowbrook | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Mount Vernon | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Mountain View | The overall winner of the competition would be: MOUNTAIN VIEW. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Mountain View), ranking (Mountain View), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Mountain View). |
| Yorktown | North Stafford | The overall winner of the competition would be: NORTH STAFFORD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (North Stafford), ranking (North Stafford), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (North Stafford). |
| Yorktown | Oakton | The overall winner of the competition would be: OAKTON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Oakton), ranking (Oakton), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Oakton). |
| Yorktown | Osbourn Park | The overall winner of the competition would be: OSBOURN PARK. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Osbourn Park), ranking (Osbourn Park), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Osbourn Park). |
| Yorktown | OsbournHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (OsbournHS). |
| Yorktown | Oscar Smith | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Patriot | The overall winner of the competition would be: PATRIOT. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Patriot), ranking (Patriot), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Patriot). |
| Yorktown | Potomac Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Robinson | The overall winner of the competition would be: ROBINSON. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Robinson), ranking (Robinson), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Robinson). |
| Yorktown | South County | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH COUNTY. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (South County), ranking (South County), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (South County). |
| Yorktown | South Lakes | The overall winner of the competition would be: SOUTH LAKES. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (South Lakes), power ranking (South Lakes), ranking (South Lakes), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (South Lakes). |
| Yorktown | StaffordHS | The overall winner of the competition would be: TIE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (StaffordHS), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (StaffordHS). |
| Yorktown | Thomas Dale | The overall winner of the competition would be: THOMAS DALE. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Thomas Dale), ranking (Thomas Dale), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Thomas Dale). |
| Yorktown | Thomas Jefferson | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Unity Reed | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Wakefield | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Yorktown), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Wash-Liberty | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Yorktown), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | West Potomac | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | West Springfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WEST SPRINGFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (West Springfield), power ranking (West Springfield), ranking (West Springfield), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (West Springfield). |
| Yorktown | Western Branch | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTERN BRANCH. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Western Branch), ranking (Western Branch), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Western Branch). |
| Yorktown | Westfield | The overall winner of the competition would be: WESTFIELD. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Yorktown), power ranking (Westfield), ranking (Westfield), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Westfield). |
| Yorktown | Woodbridge Senior | The overall winner of the competition would be: WOODBRIDGE SENIOR. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Woodbridge Senior), ranking (Woodbridge Senior), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Woodbridge Senior). |
| Yorktown | Woodson | The overall winner of the competition would be: YORKTOWN. This is based on most wins in head-to-head matchups (Tie), power ranking (Yorktown), ranking (Yorktown), total number of games played (Yorktown), and average run differential (Yorktown). |
| Yorktown | Yorktown |